This essay attempts to resolve the controversy surrounding the status and constitution of “the public” by turning to Martin Heidegger's description of what it means to be with others and how such an existence is oriented by emotions. It then provides a reading of Aristotle on the pathé and emphasizes how his analysis enables critics to make more meaningful assessments of the use of emotion in rhetorical discourse. The third section of the article illustrates this point with an examination of pathos in Jonathan Edwards’ “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.”
Rethinking “the public”: The role of emotion in being‐with‐others
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.