Empirical findings in the democracy literature suggest that small-sized and insular units hold democracy in high esteem. Utilizing Freedom House data on a comparative basis, this study verifies the existence of a strong link between small s ize and ins ularity on the one hand and dem ocracy on the other hand. Modernization theory is unable to explain this association between small size and democracy, and the same is true of the literacy and education aspect of modernization. Furthermore, an analysis of the impact of colonial heritage indicates that this factor does not challenge the explanatory power inherent in smallness alone. The usual determinants of democracy thus performing less well, contesting assumptions are called for, and a set of propositions is put forward that may prove helpful in future attempts to understand why small size is such a fertile soil for democratic standards.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.