Abstract
Soil is considered as one of the most important environmental factors for plant growth. However, the challenge is quantifying the sustainability of soil in agro-ecological systems. Presently, no soil quality assessment has been carried out in the island Mauritius or Small Island Developing States (SIDS) which would help to provide more scientific and precise advice to farmers for fertilisation and/or amendment of the soil. This is a particular handicap when recommendations need to be formulated to shift from conventional agricultural practices to a more sustainable and ecosystem-based approach. The present study attempted to determine the limiting factors of soil quality characterisation following different treatments comprising of mulch, no-mulch, N-based fertiliser, no fertiliser, tillage and no-tillage, and thereafter compare the differences in soil quality with conventional practices. In the present study, soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), exchangeable potassium (Ex. K), exchangeable calcium (Ex. Ca), exchangeable magnesium (Ex. Mg), available phosphorous (Av. P), total nitrogen (Total N) and pH were selected as part of the Total Dataset (TDS) and the weighted additive Soil Quality Index (SQIw) of each of the eight treatments was calculated and compared. The study revealed that the SQIs ranged between 0.269 and 0.387 among all treatments, which suggest a low soil quality irrespective of the treatment. On a comparative basis, treatments no-till x mulch x fertiliser, no-till x no-mulch x fertiliser, and tillage x mulch x no-fertiliser are three options that can replace the conventional method tillage x no-mulch x fertiliser (control) based on the SQI.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We greatly appreciate the support of the technical staff of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mauritius for facilitating lab work, Ms. S. Aumeerun for preparing of the paper. We extend our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and to the TTRS production team for their support.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Ethics approval
The present manuscript is not under consideration by any other journal and is an original manuscript that has not been published elsewhere. All authors confirm that the results presented are clear, honest and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
The manuscript was written with the consent of each author.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
All authors agree on the publication of the manuscript in the Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.