113
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Best use of the recommended IFCC reference method, material and values in HbA1C analyses

, , &
Pages 453-462 | Received 21 Oct 2004, Accepted 08 Apr 2005, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

The results of Finnish HbA1C surveys (Labquality Ltd.) during the past 10 years have undergone continuous improvement with smaller overall coefficients of variation for the HbA1C mean values of all methods (from 7.5 to 5.4% for normal and from 8.9 to 4.7% for diabetic samples). Most of the HbA1C methods are certified for traceability to the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) designated comparison method, which originally was a high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (Bio‐Rex 70, Bio‐Rad) but is no longer in routine use. It was therefore important that the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) had prepared both reference preparations and method for the determination of HbA1C. However, the very demanding reference method is not realistic for use in clinical laboratories. According to the present study, the mean HbA1C values of the Labquality Ltd. showed significant correlations to the HbA1C values of The European Reference Laboratory for Glycohemoglobin (r = 0.999) and to the values using the IFCC method (r = 0.999). The reference values of the IFCC method (mainly those of the manufacturer) range from 2.85 to 3.81%, being significantly lower than the present DCCT values (4.0–6.1%). Since it may take some time before consumers are ready to accept the new IFCC reference values for general use, we propose that the IFCC reference materials and method should be used for calibration of the present methods to the well‐known DCCT levels.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Cas Weykamp, Winterswijk, The Netherlands, for analyzing the HbA1C values with the reference methods, and Labquality Ltd. for the results of the HbA1C surveys placed at our disposal. We also thank laboratory technician Tero Hongisto for preparing the EDTA blood samples for the surveys, and the members of the Glycohemoglobin Working Group of Labquality Ltd. for fruitful discussions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.