Determinants of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and agreement between VerifyNow and Multiplate assays

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel is a regimen used before and after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Point-of-care platelet reactivity assays are easy-to-use methods to determine adequate response to the drug. The aim of this study was a comparison of the two platelet reactivity assays: Multiplate^® and VerifyNow^® and an identification of factors potentially influencing the results of these tests, including common genetic polymorphisms. The study included 39 patients receiving 75 mg clopidogrel daily before angioplasty with DES implantation. Platelet reactivity was measured with Multiplate and P2Y₁₂ VerifyNow assays. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19*2, ABCB1 3435C > T, and CYP3A4*1G were determined with PCR-RFLP method and CYP2C19*17 was determined by means of an allele-specific PCR. Agreement between Multiplate and VerifyNow assays was poor (Cohen’s κ = 0.056, p = .273). Hematocrit significantly negatively correlated with VerifyNow assayed platelet reactivity (r = −.487, p = .002). Female sex was significantly associated with higher VerifyNow assay results after adjustment to hematocrit (253.2 ± 47.6 PRU vs. 195.9 ± 56.9 PRU, p = .013) and the prevalence of high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (OR: 8.50; 95% CI 1.13–77.60, p = .024). Reactivity measured with Multiplate was lower in women (82.3 vs. 175.6 AU·min, p = .037) and in patients who received calcium channel blockers (74.7 vs. 191.7 AU·min, p = .002). None of the studied polymorphisms significantly influenced platelet aggregation measurements. In conclusion, different aspects modify between-patient variability of the Multiplate and VerifyNow assays and agreement between those two assays was poor.

Keywords:

• Genetic
• hematocrit
• platelet aggregation
• platelet function tests
• point-of-care systems
• polymorphism

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by National Science Centre (NCN) in Poland, grant number 2014/15/B/NZ7/00869 and Poznan University of Medical Sciences grant number 502-14-03306413-09628.