![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: Early detecting AMI in individuals presenting to the ED with chest pain continues to be a challenge. cTn is the gold standard for AMI diagnosis but early presenters (<1 hours from symptom onset) maybe cTn negative on admission. We analysed the diagnostic value of h-FABP and hs-TnI in patients presenting to ED with chest pain and no cTnI elevations.
Methods: 28 AMI and 28 no-AMI individuals both presented to ED within one hour from pain onset were included. Blood donors were analysed for h-FABP cut-off identification. Among AMI patients, 55% were positive for h-FABP and 34.6% were positive for hs-TnI (p = .015), thus 21% were positive only for h-FABP. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by ROC curve. h-FABP showed a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than hs-TnI.
Conclusions: In our study, the frequency of h-FABP positivity among AMI patients was higher than that of hs-TnI, which would have missed six of them; however, hs-TnI AUC was superior to that of h-FABP. These preliminary findings might confirm that h-FABP may be a good candidate for AMI rule-in/rule-out within the ED context.
Keywords:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.