Abstract
A standardized reference method is needed to accurately and precisely measure urine-formed elements (UFEs; red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells [WBCs], and squamous epithelial cells [sECs]). We compared the results from a standard method with those from an automated analyzer. Trained technicians used standardized bright-field microscopy of fresh non-centrifuged urine samples, and disposable 1 µl chambers. Fifteen experienced technicians from 5 hospitals (3 per hospital) each performed 6 manual counts of 10 different native urine samples using a manual chamber and standard methods. The sEC counts were at least 50/µL, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 14%; the RBC and WBC counts were at least 200/µL and the CVs were less than 7%. The same samples were also analyzed 6 times using automated analyzers. The means, CVs, and biases were determined. The median CVs for the manual measurements were 6.4% (WBCs), 6.6% (RBCs), and 12.7% (sECs). The CVs of the automated analyzer were 4.7% (WBCs), 5.6% (RBCs), and 9.2% (sECs). Biases between the automated and manual methods were −2.9% to 5.0%(WBCs), −0.8% to 8.8% (RBCs) and −2.8% to 9.4% (sECs). The count mean values and expanded uncertainties of these counts were (224.5 ± 15.0) cells/µL, (234.2 ± 16.2) cells/µL, and (61.5 ± 7.9) cells/µL, respectively. The standardized manual method for measuring UFEs had high precision and accuracy, making it a suitable reference method. Use of this reference method to calibrate an automated analyzer improved the accuracy of automated analysis.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.