417
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of sampling from a peripheral venous catheter compared to repeated venepunctures on markers of coagulation, inflammation, and endothelial function

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 584-589 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 12 Oct 2019, Published online: 21 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Peripheral venous (PV) catheters are often used for serial blood sampling, but studies suggest that PV catheters increase markers of coagulation activation and inflammation. Whether the increase is caused by irritation of the vessel wall or diurnal variation is unknown. We therefore compared the effects of a PV catheter and repeated venepunctures on markers of coagulation, inflammation, and endothelial function.

A PV catheter was inserted at 07:45 in a hand vein in 10 healthy subjects, and blood samples were collected at 8:00, 10:00, 12:00, and 14:00. In the contralateral arm, blood was simultaneously obtained by venepunctures. Measures of coagulation, i.e., activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), inflammation, i.e., interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and endothelial function, i.e., plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and tissue factor (TF) were measured in plasma.

The concentrations of TAT and F1 + 2 were significantly increased (10:00; p < .01, 12:00; p < .05, and 14:00; p < .01) in PV catheter samples compared with venepuncture samples. There was a minor increase in PT and INR and no increase in APTT, fibrinogen, CRP, PAI-1, tPA, vWF, and TF, with no differences between sampling methods. IL-6 concentrations increased in many PV catheter samples and venepuncture samples, but the response varied between the subjects.

Blood collection through a PV catheter induces coagulation activation, whereas endothelial function is not affected. More studies are needed to disclose the effect of blood sampling on IL-6.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants for their contribution to the study, and the nurse Vibeke Hardt Hansen from the Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark, for professional guidance and technical assistance regarding the PV catheters. We would also like to thank the technicians Kathrine Overgaard, Anette Larsen, and Lars Chr. Nielsen from the Unit for Thrombosis Research, University Hospital of Southern Denmark and the University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark, for collecting the venepuncture samples and analysing the blood samples.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.