250
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Detection of monoclonal free light chains by immunofixation electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing – comparison with the quantitative method of determination

, , &
Pages 556-561 | Received 08 Jan 2020, Accepted 29 Jul 2020, Published online: 11 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate free light chain (FLC) monoclonality in patients with an abnormal free kappa/lambda ratio (FLC ratio). Seventy serum samples with abnormal FLC ratio were examined using an immunoturbidimetry (Binding Site, SPA) and the two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (1. Sebia diagnostic kit; 2. in house methods), the monoclonal or oligoclonal bands of (FLC) by immunofixation electrophoresis (IE) and isoelectric focusing followed by affinity immunoblotting (IEF/AIB). The reference interval was calculated by non-parametric percentile method. 5.7% of samples examined by IE were suspected of monoclonal character of FLCs, but subsequently monoclonality was refuted by more sensitive IEF/AIB method; 7%, resp. 2.9% of samples showed FLC kappa, resp. FLC lambda oligoclonal character of bands. A statistically significant dependence was found between FLC ratio (Sebia) and FLC ratio (SPA), rs = 0.510, p = .001. Kappa statistic evaluated a fair conformity between the FLC ratio (Sebia) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.468) and between FLC ratio (in house) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.300). The verified reference interval for FLC ratio (Binding Site) is between 0.35 and 2.18. The IEF/AIB is the most sensitive method to discriminate between monoclonal and oligoclonal bands of FLC. The Binding Site and Sebia diagnostic kits do not give consistent results. The Binding Site diagnostic kit provides more results above reference interval of FLC ratios. For routine decision on monoclonality of the FLC ratio (SPA) it is advisable to use a verified reference interval.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the laboratory technicians L. Fürstová, I. Faruzelová, R. Malečková, R. Výtisková, and B. Strakošová for their expert technical assistance. The authors thank Ing. F. Všianský for help with the statistical analysis.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by University of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine, Czech Republic [project number SGS06/LF/2018-2019].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.