Diagnosing empty iron stores in women: unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC) versus soluble transferrin receptor (sTFR)

Abstract

Unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC) is more accurate than total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and percent transferrin saturation in diagnosing empty iron stores. It is unknown whether UIBC is more or less accurate than soluble transferrin receptor (sTFR). We obtained public-use data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 to compare the accuray of UIBC and sTFR in diagnosing empty iron stores in 2337 women aged 12–49 years. We grouped the women according to CRP less than 5 mg/L and pregnancy (four groups) and used three definitions of empty iron stores: Serum ferritin less than 10, 15, and 20 µg/L. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy. UIBC showed a better diagnostic accuracy than sTFR in all groups and definitions of empty iron stores, except in nonpregnant women with CRP at least 5 mg/L when empty iron stores were defined as ferritin less than 10 and 15 µg/L. Two differences reached statistical significance: In nonpregnant women without inflammation the area under the ROC curve for UIBC was 0.830 compared to 0.793 for sTFR (p = .007) when empty iron stores were defined as ferritin less than 20 µg/L. The corresponding figures for pregnant women without inflammation were 0.843 for UIBC and 0.739 for sTFR (p = .003). In conclusion, UIBC is a more accurate test than sTFR in diagnosing empty iron stores in women without inflammation.

Keywords:

• Diagnostic accuracy
• iron deficiency
• soluble transferrin receptor
• transferrin
• unbound iron binding capacity

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.