The potential value of serum GP73 in the ancillary diagnosis and grading of liver cirrhosis

Abstract

This study is to evaluate the potential value of serum GP73 in ancillary cirrhosis diagnosis. 150 cirrhotic subjects and healthy subjects were retrospectively analyzed, and the two groups were compared in terms of Child‒Pugh grade. Serum GP73 was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic value of GP73, and the quantitative relationship between cirrhosis and GP73 was verified by logistic regression. The result showed in regard to serum biomarkers related to cirrhosis, the serum levels of GP73, TBIL, DBIL, and PT were higher and the ALB and PLT were lower in the cirrhosis group than in the control group (p = 0.000), and the area under the ROC curve of GP73 for diagnosing cirrhosis was 0.823 (p = 0.000), the cutoff value was 135 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 60.0%, and the specificity was 88.67%. Logistic regression analysis showed that GP73 > 135 ng/ml had an odds ratio of 11.735 (β= 2.463, 95% CI: 6.432-21.411, p = 0.000) for diagnosing cirrhosis. Additionally, the Child‒Pugh A, B, and C groups had different levels of GP73 (χ² =17.840, p = 0.000). A pairwise comparison between the groups showed that there was a significant difference between grades A and B (p = 0.004) and between grades A and C (p = 0.002), but there was no significant difference between grades B and C (p = 1.000). We found serum GP73 levels were elevated in patients with cirrhosis. When the GP73 level was >135 ng/ml, the potential risk of a cirrhosis diagnosis increased approximately 12-fold.

Keywords:

• Golgi protein 73
• liver cirrhosis
• Child–Pugh grade

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Ying-ming Sun for his English revision.

Author contributions

Hong-bin Chen, Hui-ling Chen initiated the study design, Hui-ling Chen, Shu-ping Xiao, Huang Du, performed the majority of the data analysis and collection; Hong-bin Chen, Hui-ling Chen edited the manuscript draft. Hong-bin Chen, Kang-ming Huang, Yu Zhao edited the English manuscript.

Disclosure statement

None of the authors of this manuscript have any relevant financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to state.