Abstract
Sick neonates benefit from continuous monitoring of transcutaneous blood gases, since a blood sample only represents a single point on a variable curve. The tcpO2 value alone, does not predict the oxygen saturation or the critical point on the hemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve above which hypoxia is avoided. There are several conditions in which the tcpO2 may not be reliable. The most important factors are those of hypovolemia/hypotension and a right to left shunt through a patent ductus arteriosus. The introduction of pulse oximetry, which estimates oxygen saturation, is thus a helpful supplement in neonatology, but will not on its own predict toxic levels of pO2. The pulse oximeter does not need calibration nor time for stabilization. It is easy to place on a hand or a foot, and is therefore of great value during resuscitation and during transport. This technique does also give rise to misinterpretations. These are, however, minimized if the device shows a reliable pulse wave curve on its display. Both tcpO2/tcpCO2 and pulse oximetry are important tools, supplementing each other as they all yield valuable information.
Although both are noninvasive, blood samples are still needed. Now and then a correlation with an arterial sample has to be performed, and a noninvasive pH electrode does not exist.