42
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Oral sodium phosphate compared with water enemas combined with Bisacodyl as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy

, &
Pages 1090-1094 | Received 03 Dec 2002, Accepted 17 Jul 2003, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy with high diagnostic accuracy requires a high quality of bowel preparation using a method that is well accepted. The aim of this study was to compare oral intake of sodium phosphate solution (SP) with a conventional method of bowel preparation using Bisacodyl combined with repeated water enemas until the appearance of clear return fluid (BE) on bowel preparation and to compare patient compliance in a randomized‐investigator blinded trial. Methods: During a 3‐months period, 253 consecutive patients referred for elective colonoscopy in the outpatient clinic were evaluated. After application of the exclusion criteria, 201 patients fulfilled the criteria for the trial; 119 were randomized to SP and 82 to BE. Results: The endoscopist reported a significantly (P = 0.001) improved overall bowel preparation after SP compared with BE. Emptying was significantly better in all segments of the colon except the caecum. Colonoscopy was incomplete in 9 patients (7.6%) in the SP group and in 3 patients (3.7%) in the BE group, but this difference was not significant. The number of patients with colon pathology was similar in both groups. Only 10% in the SP group would have preferred another preparation had this been possible, compared with 89% in the BE group (P < 0.0001). Only the SP preparation emerged as a negative independent predictor of poor bowel preparation after multivariate logistic regression modelling. Conclusion: Patient compliance and quality of bowel preparation were better after SP than after BE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.