![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: Beneficial effects of lactobacilli have been reported in experimental colitis. On the other hand, despite the controversial role of nitric oxide (NO) in the inflammatory gut process, a protective action of exogenous NO in inflammation has been suggested. Consequently, this study aimed to determine the effect of (i) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a NO donor and (ii) treatment with Lactobacillus farciminis, which produces NO in vitro, on trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (TNBS)‐induced colitis in rats and to evaluate the role of exogenous NO in this effect. Methods: Rats were divided into three groups receiving one of the following: (i) a continuous intracolonic (IC) infusion of SNP for 4 days, (ii) L. farciminis orally for 19 days, or (iii) saline. On day 1 and day 15, respectively, TNBS and saline were administrated IC, followed by a continuous IC infusion of saline or haemoglobin, a NO scavenger. At the end of treatments, the following parameters were evaluated: macroscopic damage of colonic mucosa, myeloperoxidase and nitric oxide synthase activities and colonic luminal NO production. Results: In colitic rats, SNP and L. farciminis treatment significantly (P < 0.05) reduced macroscopic damage scores, myeloperoxidase and nitric oxide synthase activities compared to controls. Haemoglobin infusion abolished the anti‐inflammatory effect of both NO donor treatments, but had no effect per se on colitis. Conclusion: NO released intraluminally by SNP infusion or by L. farciminis given orally improves TNBS‐induced colitis in rats. These results indicate a protective role of NO donation in colonic inflammation and show for the first time a mechanism involving NO delivery by a bacterial strain reducing an experimental colitis.