![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective Reliable and readily available non-invasive methods are needed for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and assessment of eradication therapy. In H. pylori-positive subjects we compared three stool antigen tests (Premier Platinum HpSA, Amplified IDEIA HpStAR and ImmunoCard STAT!HpSA) with invasive tests before their eradication therapy, and with non-invasive diagnostic methods after their therapy. Material and methods A total of 82 adults with dyspepsia (aged 24–79 years) with an H. pylori-positive rapid urease test were enrolled in the study. Before therapy, H. pylori status was also confirmed with histology, culture and serology. After eradication, success was assessed with the [13C]-urea breath test (UBT) and usually also with serology. Results At baseline, sensitivities of these stool antigen tests were 90.2% for HpSA, 97.6% for HpStAR and 96.3% for ImmunoCard. Eradication therapy was successful in 66 patients and unsuccessful in 16. Sensitivity and specificity of the three stool antigen tests in the post-eradication setting were, respectively, 75.0% and 95.5% for HpSA, 93.8% and 98.5% for HpStAR and 87.5% and 95.5% for Immunocard. Conclusions The performance of all three stool antigen tests in the post-treatment setting was slightly inferior to that of the UBT test and serology, with monoclonal antibody-based tests showing better results.