Subjective results and symptomatic outcome after fundoplication revision

Abstract

Objective. In a small proportion of patients, fundoplication fails and a reoperation is required. However, there are few reports on the symptomatic outcome after reoperative antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after fundoplication revision. Material and methods. All patients (n=71) undergoing fundoplication revision between 1997 and 2005 were included in this study. The follow-up data were collected both from the hospital records and during postoperative control visits, including a personal interview using a structured questionnaire; follow-up was completed by 61 patients (88.4%). Results. The primary fundoplications included both open (n=21) and laparoscopic (n=40) approaches; 92% (n=56) of the reoperations were open procedures. The morbidity rate was 21% and the reoperation rate 16%. Fifty-six percent (n=34) of the patients regarded the result of their reoperative surgery as excellent, good or satisfactory at a mean follow-up of 51 months; 66% of the patients had no significant reflux symptoms after refundoplication. With the benefit of hindsight, 77% of the patients would again choose to undergo refundoplication, but only 48% of the patients would again primarily choose surgical treatment. Mortality rate was 1.4% (n=1) and in three patients the reoperative treatment required total gastrectomy. Conclusions. These suboptimal results show that surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general is far from being perfect and this is even more marked after reoperative antireflux surgery, as fundoplication revision can result in severe complications. This emphasizes the importance of proper patient selection for both initial and reoperative antireflux surgery.

• Fundoplication revision
• GORD
• refundoplication
• symptomatic outcome