395
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Choledocholithiasis in elderly patients with gallbladder in situ - is ERCP sufficient?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1388-1392 | Received 01 Jul 2018, Accepted 10 Sep 2018, Published online: 10 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Introduction: Along with increased life expectancy, the proportion of elderly patients with choledocholithiasis will increase and with this, the need for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Current recommendations suggest laparoscopic cholecystectomy in all patients with choledocholithiasis to prevent biliary events. However, adherence to these recommendations is low, especially in older patients.

Methods: Retrospective study that included non-cholecystectomized patients aged > =75 years who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis from 2013–2016 (n = 131). A new biliary event was defined as the need for a new ERCP, cholecystitis, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of new biliary events and mortality in cholecystectomized vs non-cholecystectomized patients after ERCP.

Results: Cholecystectomy was performed in 22% of the patients (92% laparoscopic). The post-cholecystectomy complication rate was 13% and the mortality rate was 7%. During the follow-up period (669 ± 487 days) a new biliary event occurred in 20% of patients - 10% new ERCP, 9% cholecystitis, 9% cholangitis and 2% pancreatitis. Cholecystectomized patients had fewer events (7% vs 24%, p = .048) and longer time to event (p = .016). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (14% vs 27%, p = .13), mortality related to lithiasis (0% vs 9%, p = .11) or time to mortality from all causes (p = .07) and related to biliary events (p = .07).

Conclusions: In this group of elderly patients, cholecystectomy after ERCP prevented the occurrence of new biliary events but resulted in a non-statistically significant difference in mortality.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.