163
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The clinical course of common bile duct stone clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography*

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1166-1171 | Received 12 May 2019, Accepted 28 Aug 2019, Published online: 17 Sep 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: Two-stage treatment of common bile duct stones by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is well established. In many cases multiple procedures are needed before clearance of the common bile duct is obtained. This study aimed to describe the clinical course from common bile duct stone diagnosis to successful clearance.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study from 2011 to 2014 of consecutive patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography at a public university hospital.

Results: In this study 297 patients with common bile duct stones were identified. More than one Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography was performed in 174 (59%) patients and more than two in 51(17%) before clearance. A sphincterotomy was performed in 269 (91%) patients and 189 (64%) had a stent inserted. Bleeding occurred in 17 (6%) requiring injection treatment and post procedure complications occurred in 38 (13%). Subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 180 (61%) patients. Overall, the patients were hospitalized for 11 (8.5) days and the length of treatment from diagnose to stone clearance was 49 (84.5) days. Overweight, pancreatitis at admission, universal anesthesia, and expert level endoscopist inversely determined common bile duct clearance failure.

Conclusions: Common bile duct clearance by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography requires multiple procedures and complications are frequent leading to prolonged treatment and hospitalization suggesting a limited efficacy.

Author contributions

The study was designed by all authors. Analysis was carried out by LBJN and DMS. Interpretation was done by LBJN, DMS and LTS. Drafting was carried out by LBJN. Critical revision was performed by all the authors. The approval for submitted version was provided by all the authors.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, Dr. Daniel Mønsted Shabanzadeh, Dr. Anna Aaresøn and Dr. Lars Tue Sørensen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.