328
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effect of prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1291-1299 | Received 05 Aug 2019, Accepted 26 Sep 2019, Published online: 23 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now commonly performed as a treatment for not only gastric tumor but also colorectal tumor. However, colorectal ESD has a substantial risk of complications, including post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome, bowel perforation and bleeding. This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic endoscopic closure can reduce the occurrence of complications after colorectal ESD.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent colorectal ESD in our unit were randomly assigned to either of two groups. Prophylactic endoscopic closure for an artificial ulceration after ESD was performed in group I but not in group II. After the procedure, the incidence of complications, visual analog scale (VAS) score for abdominal pain, and laboratory findings were investigated.

Results: Of the 220 patients (110 per group) enrolled in this study, 137 were men. No significant differences were found in age, sex, comorbidity, medication history, tumor location, size of resected specimen, and pathologic result between the two groups. No significant difference was found in ESD outcomes, including hospitalization period, laboratory findings, VAS score for abdominal pain, incidence of surgical operation, and incidence of post-ESD complications, between the two groups.

Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, prophylactic endoscopic closure after colorectal ESD does not decrease the incidence of complications, and it does not ameliorate inflammatory response and abdominal pain.

Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001666.

Ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University Medical Center (KUH1010700).

Disclosure statement

All authors disclose no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Konkuk University Medical Center Research Grant 2016.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.