180
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Early serum infliximab trough level and mucosal healing could be predictors for one-year outcome after initiating therapy in Crohn’s disease

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 1035-1040 | Received 19 May 2020, Accepted 19 Jul 2020, Published online: 20 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

Background and aims

Serum infliximab trough level(S-IFX) and antibody were documented to correlate with clinical response. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between early S-IFX, early mucosal healing (MH) and one-year outcome in a cohort on maintenance IFX therapy in Crohn’s disease (CD).

Methods

The study group comprised of retrospectively enrolled patients diagnosed for Crohn’s disease (n = 108). Patients received scheduled maintenance therapy after response to IFX induction, and had undergone the early S-IFX test and endoscopic examination at week 14. Clinical outcomes were evaluated during maintenance therapy until week 52.

Results

Early S-IFX was 4.78 ± 6.16 ug/ml in all the patients and 19% (21/108) of them developed antibodies, and 52 patients reached early MH. During 52 weeks’ follow-up. Twenty-eight percent (30/108) of patients showed loss of response to IFX. Patients who lost response had lower early S-IFX than those who had sustained response (3.01 ± 3.66 vs. 5.47 ± 6.79 ug/ml, p = .02; 48 vs. 23%, p =  .02). At week 52, 73 patients had repeated endoscopy and 42% of them reached MH. Early S-IFX had a predictive value on MH at week 52. When early S-IFX > 2.5 ug/ml, the sensitivity for predicting MH at week 52 was 87%, and the specificity were 61% (AUC = 0.73, p < .01). The combined predictive value of early S-IFX and early MH became stronger. Only 6% (1/18) of those patients who had low early S-IFX and had not reached early MH could reach MH at week 52.

Conclusions

Early S-IFX and early MH could predict one-year response after initiating IFX therapy in Crohn’s disease.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

Xiang GAO as correspondent author: conception and design, revising the article, final approval of the version to be published. Jian TANG andQingfan YANG as co-first author: conception and design, drafting the article, final approval of the version to be published. Zicheng HUANG: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, final approval of the version to be published. Huili GUO: analysis and interpretation of data, final approval of the version to be published. Kang CHAO: conception and design, revising the article critically, final approval of the version to be published. Pinjin HU: conception, revising the article, final approval of the version to be published.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.