1,519
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Accuracy of Finnish Cancer Registry colorectal cancer data: a comparison between registry data and clinical records

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 247-251 | Received 24 Sep 2020, Accepted 17 Dec 2020, Published online: 06 Jan 2021
 

Abstract

Background

The population-based Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) is an important resource for research and healthcare politics in Finland. The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of the colorectal cancer (CRC) data within the FCR.

Material and methods

FCR data are based on independent cancer report forms (CRFs) from both clinicians and pathologists. Data from patients diagnosed with CRC during a randomized, population-based CRC screening program between 2004 and 2012 were extracted from the FCR and compared to data extracted from the original clinical patient records of these individuals by two gastrointestinal surgeons. The study focused on tumour characteristics and primary treatment. Accuracy was measured by calculating Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ), which considers the possibility of agreement by chance.

Results

Altogether, 1475 patients were studied. κ was 0.74 for stage, 0.87 for tumour location (right/left), 0.78 for a more detailed location, 0.72 for tumour histology, 0.46 for surgical removal of the primary tumour, and 0.43 for chemotherapy. Among those who underwent surgery, the radicality of surgical treatment had a κ of 0.24. In total, 173 (12%) patients were lacking a CRF from a clinician.

Conclusion

The FCR data had good accuracy regarding tumour characteristics, but poor accuracy in treatment information. The main reason for this suboptimal accuracy was missing CRFs from treating clinicians. Awareness of these findings is crucial when research and decision making is based on FCR data. Measures have since been taken to improve the completeness of FCR recording.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest that would have biased the work.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by Helsinki University Hospital’s Research grants and the Cancer Society of Finland. The funders had no involvement in design, data collection, findings or decision to publish.