94
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Weight change after colectomy for ulcerative colitis

, , , , &
Pages 1331-1333 | Received 03 Apr 2022, Accepted 09 Jun 2022, Published online: 20 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

Background and objective

Weight change after colectomy for ulcerative colitis is unknown. The main objective of this study was to describe weight change during surgical management of ulcerative colitis.

Methods

All patients, underwent a subtotal colectomy, then a proctectomy with J ileal pouch anal anastomosis protected by an ileostomy, and finally an ileostomy closure in the context of ulcerative colitis at the Nancy University Hospital from May 2014 to October 2020, were included. For each patient, his healthy weight, preoperative weight and postoperative weight were recorded for each step of surgery.

Results

Twenty-six patients were included. The median body mass index of healthy weight was 23.3 kg/m2. Before subtotal colectomy, the median body mass index decreased to 21.3 kg/m2, a reduction of 8.5%. One month after subtotal colectomy, the median body mass index was at its lowest level of 20.8 kg/m2, which represented a 10.7% decrease from the healthy weight. Thereafter a significant increase in body mass index was observed before the proctectomy, reaching the threshold of 22.8 kg/m2, an increase of 8.7% from the lowest level. After the last surgical time, which corresponds to the ileostomy closure, the body mass index was 23.2 kg/m2, this threshold was comparable to the healthy weight body mass index.

Conclusion

Our study showed for the first time that after colectomy for ulcerative colitis, patients regained their healthy weight, which constitutes a reassuring message for patients before surgery.

Author contributions

MK contributed to data collection, wrote the article, and created figure. BC wrote the article and created figure. AM and AA critical reviewed the manuscript. LPB and AG conceived the study, critically reviewed the content of the paper, and supervised the project. The manuscript was approved by all authors.

Disclosure statement

M Kouki, A Malgras, A Ayav, and A Germain declare no conflict of interest. B Caron has received lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, Takeda. L Peyrin-Biroulet has received – personal fees from Galapagos, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, Index Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Celgene, Biogen, Samsung Bioepis, Inotrem, Allergan, MSD, Roche, Arena, Gilead, Amgen, BMS, Vifor, Norgine, Mylan, Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Enthera, Theravance, Pandion Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Viatris, Thermo Fisher – grants from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Fresenius Kabi – stock options: CTMA.

Data availability statement

The data underlying this article are available in the article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.