91
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Paper

Optimizing the Number of Electrodes with High-rate Stimulation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant

, , &
Pages 138-142 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective—This blind crossover study evaluates the effect of the number of electrodes of the Clarion CII cochlear implant on speech perception in silence and in noise using a “high-rate” continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy. Material and Methods—Nine users of this implant with 3–11 months of experience of an 8-channel CIS strategy [833 pulses per second (pps)/channel, 75 μs/phase] were fitted in a random order with 8-, 12- and 16-channel CIS strategies (±1400 pps/channel, 21 μs/phase). After 1 month of exclusive use of each strategy the performance was tested with consonant–vowel–consonant words in silence (sound only) and in speech-shaped background noise with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of +10, +5, 0 and −5 dB. Results—With “high-rate” strategies most patients’ speech understanding in noise improved, although the optimum number of electrodes was highly variable. Generally, faster performers benefited from more active electrodes, whilst slower performers deteriorated. If each patient's optimal strategy was determined by a weighted sum of the test results at +10, +5 and 0 dB SNR, the average phoneme score improved from 57% to 72% at a SNR of +5 dB, and from 46% to 56% at a SNR of 0 dB. The average phoneme score in silence was ≈85% for all strategies. Conclusion—We conclude that speech perception (especially in noise) can improve significantly with “high-rate” speech processing strategies, provided that the optimum number of electrodes is determined for each patient individually.

Frijns JHM, Klop WMC, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 138–142.

Frijns JHM, Klop WMC, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 138–142.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.