Effect of adhesion barrier (interceed TC7) on two-stage orchidopexy operation

Abstract

Objective: In two-stage orchidopexy, adhesions formed after the first stage usually cause difficulty during the second operation and may even lead to injury to the testis itself or to the spermatic cord. We investigated whether the use of adhesion-preventing barriers in the abdominal or pelvic region during surgery could lessen adhesions formed during two-stage orchidopexy and thus ease dissection. Material and Methods: The study subjects comprised 21 male, albino, 30-day-old Wistar rats that were divided into three equal groups. In Group 1, the right testes were enveloped in adhesion barriers after dissection and sutured to the inguinal canal. In Group 2, the right testes were sutured to the inguinal canal without the barriers. In Group 3 (sham-operated group), all testes were dissected but no suturing was performed. Rats were sacrificed after 21 days and the ipsilateral testes were harvested. Results: Dissection of barrier-enveloped testes was relatively easy; however, no significant (p < 0.535) difference was seen in adhesion scores between Groups 1 and 2. Total tissue collagen was estimated by means of the hydroxyproline content. Tissue hydroxyproline levels were 16.04 ± 8.58, 13.20 ± 6.34 and 14.71 ± 5.51 μg/mg wet tissue in Groups 1-3, respectively and these differences were not significant. The histopathologic evaluation revealed significant differences only in the thickness of the tunica albuginea in Groups 1 and 2 (110.0 ± 30.0 vs 77.1 ± 21.3 μm, respectively; p < 0.038). Conclusion: The adhesion scores and the biochemical and histopathological examinations showed that an adhesion barrier is not beneficial in two-stage orchidopexy.

• Adhesion Barrier
• Hydroxyproline
• Orchidopexy
• Testis