156
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Reliability testing of the Danish version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form™

, , &
Pages 498-502 | Received 28 Jun 2004, Published online: 09 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. The questionnaire Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form version 1.3 (KDQOL-SF™) is valuable for assessing the health-related quality of life in patients treated with chronic dialysis. The aim of this study was to translate and test the reliability of the KDQOL-SF for use in Denmark. Material and methods. Translation into Danish and back-translation into English were performed. Pilot, field and internal consistency reliability tests were performed. Results. Cronbach's α coefficients for the internal reliability test ranged from 0.77 to 0.93 for the eight generic scales. In a test involving all patients, two of the disease-specific scales had Cronbach's α coefficients of <0.70 (“social support” = 0.67; and “quality of social interaction” = 0.43). After removing one item from the scale “quality of social interaction”, Cronbach's α reached 0.63. A test of the scores of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients discovered low reliability for three disease-specific scales. The KDQOL-SF manual and the Danish manual for the Short Form 36 (SF36) differed in the scoring of four generic scales: “role limitation—physical”, “bodily pain”, “general health” and “social function”. Conclusions. With the exception of the scale “quality of social interaction” the Danish translation of the KDQOL-SF achieved values in the internal consistency reliability test of the same level as the original U.S. version. When data were stratified according to dialysis treatment, the reliability of PD patients scores was lower. Generic data from the questionnaire SF36 should be scored according to the Danish SF36 manual.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.