Advanced search
Publication Cover
Technometrics Volume 32, 1990 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
52
Views
97
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Small Response-Surface Designs

Norman R. Draper Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706
&
Dennis K. J. Lin Department of Statistics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996
Pages 187-194 | Published online: 12 Mar 2012
 
Sample our Mathematics & Statistics journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days

Abstract

Standard composite designs for fitting second-order response surfaces typically have a fairly large number of points, especially when k is large. In some circumstances, it is desirable to reduce the number of runs as much as possible while maintaining the ability to estimate all of the terms in the model. We first review prior work on small composite designs and then suggest some alternatives for k ≤ 10 factors. In some cases, even minimal-point designs are possible.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related Research Data

Saturated Fractions of 2 n and 3 n Factorial Designs
Source: JSTOR
Enumeration and Multicriteria Selection of Orthogonal Minimally Aliased Response Surface Designs
Source: Informa UK Limited
Robustness of response surface designs to missing data
Source: Wiley
Composite Designs Based on Orthogonal Arrays and Definitive Screening Designs
Source: Taylor & Francis
Minimal point second order designs
Source: Elsevier BV
Smallest Composite Designs for Quadratic Response Surfaces
Source: JSTOR
The choice of a second order rotatable design
Source: Oxford University Press (OUP)
A Comparison of Prediction Variance Criteria for Response Surface Designs
Source: Informa UK Limited
Optimum Composite Designs
Source: Informa UK Limited
Discovery of an Hadamard matrix of order 92
Source: American Mathematical Society (AMS)
COMPOSITE DESIGNS BASED ON IRREGULAR FRACTIONS OF FACTORIALS.
Source: JSTOR
Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces
Source: Institute of Mathematical Statistics
On Minimum-Point Second-Order Designs
Source: Informa UK Limited
Factorial Designs, the |X′X| Criterion, and Some Related Matters
Source: Informa UK Limited
Fundamentals of Experimental Design: Guidelines for Designing Successful Experiments
Source: Wiley
Irregular Fractions of the 2 n Factorial Experiments
Source: JSTOR
A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design
Source: Informa UK Limited
THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS
Source: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Small Composite Designs
Source: Informa UK Limited
Capacity considerations for two-level fractional factorial designs
Source: Elsevier BV

Linking provided by 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.