102
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The evaluation of the uncertainty of the research method on the geometrical parameters of the embroidery elements

, , , &
Pages 1202-1209 | Received 20 May 2018, Accepted 20 Nov 2018, Published online: 29 Dec 2018
 

Abstract

The indirect measurement method of the contour width deformation of the embroidery element is presented in the work. The square-shaped, directly measured, embroidery element is compared to its digital image. Together with the used test methods steps, the reliability criteria for this method are presented as well. The reliability of the method of measuring the geometrical parameters of a closed contour element of an embroidered square shape is evaluated by analyzing its systematic and random errors and by calculating the total standard uncertainty. In assessing the accuracy of the measurement method, there is also a talk about a comprehensive assessment of measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainties are considered to be one of the most important parameters of the ability of a method to determine the possibilities of using and applying the method. When measuring the parameters of real samples, the components of total uncertainty related to the characteristics of the specimen (weave, surface density, filling characteristics, direction of the fabric yarn), their variation within certain limits and possible correlation among these components, influence of the standard means, data processing, digital image calibration were evaluated. It has been determined during the research that a negative error ∼2.4% with expanded uncertainty ∼3.3% complying with the requirements of the reliability of the method is typical for the deformation measurement method applied for the measurement of the five (6, 10, 14, 18, and 22 mm) elements of different contour widths. Because of that the evaluation of the uncertainty according its components is useful while analyzing the factors which have an impact on the deformation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.