190
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Restrictive and non-restrictive modification of proprial lemmas

&
Pages 9-36 | Published online: 15 May 2015
 

Abstract

The notion of rigid designation has become a widely accepted, if not unproblematic one in connection with the function of proper names. In this paper, some less “rigid” uses of proper names will be looked at. Proprial lemmas—that is to say, words that function prototypically as proper names—may sometimes function as common nouns rather than as proper names, for instance in There are two Johns in my class. On the other hand, proprial lemmas may also receive some amount of modification without acquiring the “categorizing” function of common nouns, but rather retaining the rigid, unique designation associated with proper names, as in An angry Blair left the meeting yesterday. The aim of the present paper is twofold: (i) to offer a workable terminological and conceptual framework to deal with these different constructional schemata involving proprial lemmas; and (ii) to propose a tentative classification of both “restrictive” and “non-restrictive” modification of proprial lemmas into distinct subtypes. In the end, it is hoped, these endeavours may shed a new light on the nature and potential of proper names and proprial lemmas.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.