Hume's “Wilt Chamberlain Argument” and taxation

Abstract

Robert Nozick addresses the idea of egalitarian redistribution in an argument standardly considered original: the “Wilt Chamberlain Argument”. However, this argument (without reference to Wilt Chamberlain) is found in David Hume's AnEnquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, first published in 1751. Placing this argument within a Humean and Hayekian, rather than a Lockean or Kantian, perspective radically changes its import for issues of economic justice. Rather than vindicating the radical individualism of Nozick and other libertarians, applied to our circumstances using Hume's conventionalist and evolutionary account of justice, Hume's Wilt Chamberlain argument vindicates moderate redistribution constrained by the rule of general laws and the goal of fostering innovation and industriousness.

Keywords::

• Hume
• Nozick
• Hayek
• property
• taxation
• Wilt Chamberlain
• libertarianism

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Kenneth Henley

Kenneth Henley is Professor of Philosophy at Florida International University. He has published articles on ethics and political and legal philosophy in various books and journals. He has recently focused on the political and moral philosophy of David Hume, especially in relationship to the topic of the rule of law.