![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
Abstract
A sample survey of anthelmintic usage and farmers' drenching policies was conducted on 614 sheep farms, in the North and South Islands, selected from among those carrying 1500 or more breeding ewes. The survey was based on information for the 1978/79 and 1979/80 farming years recorded on questionnaires completed during personal interviews between Livestock Officers and the farmers concerned.
Results show that there were no significant between-Island differences in mean drenching frequencies for any age class of sheep. In 1979/80, the overall New Zealand drenching frequencies were 6.3 for lambs, 1.8 for 1-2-year-olds and 1.2 for sheep older than 2 years. Of the farmers surveyed, 20% did not drench 1-2-year-old sheep and 29% did not drench sheep older than 2 years.
There were also no between-Island differences in timing of drenches and alternation of drench brands. Sixty-nine per cent of the farmers followed a pre-determined drenching programme whereas 27% stated that they drenched if and when necessary. For lambs, some drenching was carried out in all months of the year but fewer farmers drenched during the mid-winter to mid-spring period (July-October). Older stock were drenched in all months also but there was a general acceptance by farmers of the practices of pre-tupping and pre- or post-lambing drenching.
At the time of the survey, 48% of the farmers were using three or more brands of drench with a maximum of nine. Analysis of data relating to brands of drench used shows that whereas 39% of the farmers were alternating drench families [i.e. benzimidazoles (BZ) c.f. non-benzimidazoles (NBZ)] within a single farming year, only 3% were practising a strict alternation of drench families between years.
General comments by the farmers surveyed indicate a disturbing degree of misunderstanding and misconception regarding the properties and limitations of current anthelmintics. The survey also revealed a lack of appreciation of the rationale of prophylactic (‘preventive’) parasite control. These aspects are discussed in relation to currently recommended control strategies and the problem of anthelmintic resistance.