240
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communications

A survey of the prevalence of Nematodirus spathiger and N. filicollis on farms in the North and South Islands of New Zealand

, &
Pages 286-289 | Received 19 Aug 2013, Accepted 07 Mar 2014, Published online: 08 Aug 2014
 

Abstract

AIM: To compare the prevalence of Nematodirus spathiger and N. filicollis on a sample of farms in the lower South Island with the lower and central North Island of New Zealand by way of a presence/absence survey.

METHODS: A presence/absence non-random survey was conducted in which pooled faeces from lambs from 50 farms in the lower and central North Island (n=22) and lower South Island (n=28) were cultured, with and without a post-culture period of chilling, to produce third-stage parasitic nematode larvae (L3). After recovery using the Baermann technique, individual L3 were identified to Nematodirus spp. using a PCR assay. This identified the species that were present on each farm that were then used to compare the regions.

RESULTS: Nematodirus filicollis was present in 38/50 (76%) samples from which Nematodirus spp. larvae were cultured, compared with 50/50 (100%) in the case of N. spathiger. No regional differences were observed in the prevalence of either species (p=0.74). Of the Nematodirus spp. L3 recovered from the unchilled samples, 415/428 (97%) were N. spathiger and 13/428 (3%) N. filicollis. After chilling 594/695 (85%) of the Nematodirus spp. L3 were N. spathiger and 101/695 (15%) were N. filicollis.

CONCLUSION: Despite the non-random nature of the study, the evidence suggests that both these species are likely to occur sympatrically on most sheep farms throughout New Zealand. In general N. filicollis eggs did not hatch without a period of chilling and this has implications for the identification of these larvae using conventional culture methods.

Acknowledgements

We thank Wendy Taylor and Charlotte Bouchet for assistance with laboratory work, Stewart Bisset and Jacqui Knight for access to and advice on the protocol for identifying larvae, and the vets and farmers who collected and sent in samples. Ross Bland and Stewart Bisset made helpful comments on a draft manuscript. This work was funded by the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology under contract C10X0714.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.