Publication Cover
Xenobiotica
the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems
Volume 39, 2009 - Issue 10
198
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Blood gas partition coefficient and pulmonary extraction ratio for propofol in goats and pigs

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 782-787 | Received 08 Mar 2009, Accepted 20 May 2009, Published online: 23 Jun 2009
 

Abstract

  1. The interpretation of continuously measured propofol concentration in respiratory gas demands knowledge about the blood gas partition coefficient and pulmonary extraction ratio for propofol. In the present investigation we compared both variables for propofol between goats and pigs during a propofol anaesthesia.

  2. In ten goats and ten pigs, expired alveolar gas and arterial and mixed venous blood samples were simultaneously drawn during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. The blood gas partition coefficient and pulmonary extraction ratio were calculated for both species. Non-parametric methods were used for statistical inference.

  3. The blood gas partition coefficient ranged between 7000 and 646 000 for goats and between 17 000 and 267 000 for pigs. The pulmonary extraction ratio ranged between 32.9% and 98.1% for goats and was higher for pigs, which ranged between −106.0% and 39.0%.

  4. The blood gas partition coefficient for propofol exceeded those for other known anaesthetic compounds so that it takes longer to develop a steady-state. The different pulmonary extraction rates in two species suggest that there are different ways to distribute propofol during the lung passage on its way from the blood to breathing gas. This species-specific difference has to be considered for methods using the alveolar gas for monitoring the propofol concentration in plasma.

Acknowledgements

Only departmental support was provided for funding this research. Parts of the work were presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), 14–18 October 2006, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Acknowledgement is made to the following for technical support: Professor Norbert W. Guldner, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; and Ellen Spies, Technician, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.