Adult equivalence scales, inequality and poverty∗

A first draft of this paper was written at the NZ Treasury. The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are strictly those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury or the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. We should like to thank Nathan McLellan, a referee and the editor of this journal for helpful suggestions.

Abstract

This paper examines the sensitivity of inequality and poverty measures to the adult equivalence scale and the unit of analysis. Comparisons are made using parametric equivalence scales, and income units include individuals, equivalent adults and households. The role of the correlation between equivalent income and household size, and the weight attached to children, is examined analytically. Empirical results are based on New Zealand Household Expenditure Survey (HES) data for total expenditure. Further results using a variety of equivalence scales, for New Zealand, Australia, the UK and the OECD, are examined.

Notes

A first draft of this paper was written at the NZ Treasury. The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are strictly those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Zealand Treasury or the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. We should like to thank Nathan McLellan, a referee and the editor of this journal for helpful suggestions.

John Creedy, University of Melbourne, Cathy Sleeman, Reserve Bank of New Zealand