Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. Indian Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, section 116.
2. The Times of India (8 Sept. 2014) [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Drones-to-keep-watch-during-polling-day-in-Lucknow/articleshow/42052032.cms?, accessed 7 Mar. 2017].
3. Emphasis added.
4. The Hindu (24 Mar. 2014) [http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/biometric-systems-to-police-cops-antisocial-elements/article5827050.ece, accessed 7 Mar. 2017].
5. The Hindu (6 June 2012) [http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/antigoonda-act-to-get-more-teeth/article3495521.ece, accessed 7 Mar. 2017].
6. Tribune News Service (4 Feb. 2015) [http://tribunecontentagency.com/tribune-news-service/, accessed 14 May 2015].
7. Mss. Eur. f 180/8, India Office Collection, British Library, London.
8. Radhika Singha, ‘Punished by Surveillance: Policing “Dangerousness” in Colonial India, 1872–1918’, in Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 49, no. 2 (2015), pp. 241–69.
9. Ibid., p. 244.