Gendering Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Commercial Surrogacy and Constructions of Motherhood

Abstract

Literature on commercial surrogacy argues that assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) problematise presumed essentialist dichotomies of nature and culture. While technologies of commercial surrogacy naturalise the medicalisation of the body, these technologies in turn also produce new knowledge about the biological facts of the body. In what ways are knowledge about reproductive labour and women’s reproductive capacities embedded in these technologies? How do these technologies invite us to imagine maternal bodies? Under regimes of stratified reproduction that inflect reproductive bodies with caste, class and racial politics, how do we read the production of the gendered body within commercial gestational surrogacy practices? The paper draws on ethnographic research conducted in Mumbai to study how technologies of commercial surrogacy interact with the normative idioms of conception. I will attempt to show how assumptions about gendered bodies and gendered roles are embedded within the material teleologies of these technologies, which in turn produce newer material-semiotic significations of the reproductive body.

Keywords:

• Assisted reproductive technology
• commercial surrogacy
• embodiment
• gender
• motherhood
• reproduction

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Mhairi Montgomery and Professor Kama Maclean for their patient and thoughtful feedback, as well as the anonymous reviewers at South Asia for their comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. Sneha Banerjee and Prabha Kotiswaran, ‘Divine Labours, Devalued Work: The Continuing Saga of India’s Surrogacy Regulation’, Indian Law Review 5, no. 2 (2020): 85–105. Draft ART bills were published in 2008, 2010, 2014 and 2021.

2. Marilyn Strathern, ‘Still Giving Nature a Helping Hand? Surrogacy: A Debate about Technology and Society’, Journal of Molecular Biology 14, no. 4 (2002): 985–93.

3. Sarah Franklin, ‘Re-Thinking Nature—Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics’, Anthropological Theory 3, no. 1 (2008): 65–85.

4. Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Morrow, 1970).

5. Gena Corea, The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs (New York: Harper & Row, 1985).

6. Sarah Franklin, ‘Postmodern Procreation’, in Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Faye Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995): 323–45.

7. Charis Thompson, ‘Fertile Ground: Feminists Theorize Infertility’, in Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, ed. Marcia Inhor and Frank van Balen (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002): 52–79.

8. See Rosi Braidotti, ‘Mothers, Monsters, and Machines’, in Nomadic Subjects (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997); and Margrit Shildrick, Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Deconstruction and Bioethics (Coventry: University of Warwick, 1997): 59–79.

9. Rosalind Pollack Petchesky, Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom (Boston, NH: University Press of New England, 1984).

10. Rebecca Kukla, Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies (London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005): 26.

11. Barbara Katz Rothman, The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood (London: Penguin Books, 1993).

12. Aihwa Ong, ‘The Gender and Labour Politics of Postmodernity’, Annual Review of Anthropology 20 (1991): 279–309.

13. Marcel Mauss, ‘Techniques of the Body’,  Economy and Society 2, no. 1 (1973): 70–88.

14. Guido Pennings, ‘Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion’, Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2002): 337–41.

15. Marcia Inhorn and Pankaj Shrivastav, ‘Globalization and Reproductive Tourism in the United Arab Emirates’, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 22, no. 3 (2010): 68–74.

16. Arjun Appadurai, ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’, in Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Identity, ed. M. Featherston (London: Sage, 2010): 296–308.

17. Amrita Pande, Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).

18. Carole H. Browner and Carolyn F. Sargent, Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).

19. Faye Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp, Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).

20. Arlie Russel Hochschild, The Managed Heart (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).

21. Dorothy E. Roberts, Killing the Black Body (New York: Pantheon Books, 1997).

22. Ibid., 11.

23. Thompson, ‘Fertile Ground’.

24. Cited in Nadja-Christina Schneider, Family Norms and Images in Transition: Contemporary Negotiations of Reproductive Labor, Love and Relationships in India (Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, 2020): 35.

25. Amrita Banerjee, ‘Race and a Transnational Reproductive Caste System: Indian Transnational Surrogacy’, Hypatia 29, no. 1 (2014): 113–28.

26. Ibid., 120.

27. Sarah Hodges and Mohan Rao, Public Health and Private Wealth: Stem Cells, Surrogates and Other Strategic Bodies (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016).

28. Mohan Rao, ‘The Globalization of Reproduction in India: From Population Control to Surrogacy’, in Public Health and Private Wealth: Stem Cells, Surrogates and Other Strategic Bodies, ed. Sarah Hodges and Mohan Rao (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016): 151–179.

29. Sanjam Ahluwalia, Reproductive Restraints: Birth Control in India, 1877–1947 (Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007).

30. Kaushik Sunder Rajan, ‘Experimental Values—Indian Clinical Trials and Surplus Health’, New Left Review 45 (2007): 67–88.

31. Census of India, 2011, accessed May 18, 2022, https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/population-finde.

32. Sarah Franklin and Margaret Lock, ‘Animation and Cessation’, in Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, ed. Sara Franklin (Santa Fe, NM: Oxford University Press, 2013): 3–22; see also Stefan Helmreich, ‘Species of Biocapital’, Science as Culture 17, no. 4 (2008): 463–78.

33. Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: Vol. I: An Introduction (New York: Vintage Books, 1990): 143.

34. Maya Unnithan, ‘Culture and Reproductive Ageing’, in Reproductive Ageing in Older Women, ed. Susan Bewley, William Ledger and Dimitrios Nikolaou (London: RCOG Press, 2009): 15–61.

35. Caroline Bledsoe, Contingent Lives: Fertility, Time and Aging in West Africa (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).

36. Jörg Niewöhner and Margaret Lock, ‘Situating Local Biologies: Anthropological Perspectives on Environment/Human Entanglements’, BioSocieties 13, no. 4 (2018): 681–97.

37. Sunita Reddy et al., ‘Breastfeeding and Bonding: Issues and Dilemmas in Surrogacy’, in Ethnographies of Breastfeeding: Cultural Contexts and Confrontations, ed. Tanya Cassidy and Abdullahi El Tom (New York: Bloomsbury, 2015): 157–183.

38. Susan Martha Kahn, Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000).

39. Pande, Wombs in Labor.

40. Maya Unnithan and Sunil K. Khanna, Cultural Politics of Reproduction: Migration, Health and Family Making (London: Berghahn Books, 2008).

41. Ilyn Morgan, Icons of Life: A Cultural History of Human Embryos (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009).

42. Anandita Majumdar, Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un) Making of Kin in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2017).

43. Lawrence Cohen, ‘Operability, Bioavailability, and Exception’, in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed. Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier (Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing, 2007).

44. Bruno Latour, ‘How to Talk about the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies’, Body & Society 10, nos. 2–3 (2004): 205–29.

45. Amrita Pande, ‘Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker’, Signs 35, no. 4 (2010): 969–92.

46. Ma Na Sapna—A Mother’s Dream, directed by Valerie Gudenus (Austria: Dario Schoch, 2013).

47. Sheela Saravanan, A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India (Singapore: Springer, 2018).

48. Anindita Majumdar, ‘Nurturing an Alien Pregnancy: Surrogate Mothers, Intended Parents and Disembodied Relationships’, in Indian Journal of Gender Studies 21, no. 2 (2014): 199–224.

49. Can We See the Baby Bump Please?, directed by Surabhi Sharma (India: SAMA Resource Group for Women and Health, 2013).

50. Marilyn Strathern, Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

51. Elly Teman, Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).

52. Genaro Castro-Vasquez, Intimacy and Reproduction in Contemporary Japan (London: Taylor & Francis, 2016).

53. Margaret Lock, ‘Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge’, Annual Review of Anthropology 22 (1993): 133–55.

54. Marilyn Strathern, Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).

55. Anindita Majumdar, ‘The Rhetoric of Choice: The Feminist Debates on Reproductive Choice in the Commercial Surrogacy Arrangement in India’, Gender, Technology and Development 17, no. 2 (2014): 275–301.