Is “Dilator Use” More Effective Than “Finger Use” in Exposure Therapy in Vaginismus Treatment?

Abstract

Vaginismus is the persistence of difficulties in allowing the vaginal entry of a penis, a finger or a gynecologic examination. This study aimed to compare the success rates of vaginismus therapy with exposure therapy treatment using a finger or a dilator. The finger training group (FTG) (n = 30) and the dilator training group (DTG) (n = 30) were established. Groups were trained about dilatation and desensitization. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was applied. From the baseline measurement to the post-treatment measurement, the average change in FSFI scores for both groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between two groups in terms of patient drop-out numbers (p = 0.016); the DTG was more successful in continuing treatment than the FTG. This research revealed that DTG is more successful in treatment continuity and show more improvement in sexual functions.

Acknowledgements

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.