65
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Prereductions of ideals in local rings

, &
Pages 2798-2817 | Received 25 Jun 2019, Accepted 15 Jan 2020, Published online: 17 Feb 2020
 

Abstract

This paper contributes several results to the analytic theory of ideals. The main new concept is that of a prereduction (together with the closely related type-prereduction): if R is a ring and A  I (proper subset) are proper ideals in R, then A is called a prereduction of I in case A is not a reduction of I, but each ideal between A and I is a reduction of I. It is shown that each non-nilpotent proper ideal in a Noetherian ring has at least one prereduction, and a number of the basic properties of the ideals in the set P(I) of all prereductions of I are proved. Also, if I is a non-nilpotent proper ideal in a local (Noetherian) ring (R, M), then:

  1. There is a natural one-to-one correspondence between the set E(I) of the equivalence classes of the type-prereductions of I and the set Q(I) of the maximal relevant ideals in the Rees ring of I (that is, the homogeneous prime ideals Q in the ring R[t1,It] (t an indeterminate) such that It  Q and the Krull dimension of R[t1,It]/Q is equal to one).

  2. P(In) is the set of maximal elements in {Q[n] | QQ(I)} for all positive integers n, and, for each Q  Q(I), Q[m]P(Im) for all large integers m.

  3. A complete description is given of the prereductions and the elements in E(I) for each ideal I that is generated by analytically independent elements.

  4. If R/M is algebraically closed and I is a non-nilpotent and non-principal ideal in R, then there is a natural one-to-one correspondence between the sets P(I) and E(I), and P(In)={Q[n] | QQ(I)} for all positive integer n.

AMS 2010 SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:

Notes

1 It is shown in Corollary 7.2 (in Section 7) that bM is the unique prereduction of a non-nilpotent proper principal ideal bR in a local ring (R, M).

2 This is a special case of Example 3.2.4.

3 When it is unnecessary to refer to the specific integers k and n1,,nk, then we will generically use type-reduction in place of reduction-of-type [n1,,nk] (and, similarly, type-prereduction in place of prereduction-of-type [n1,,k]).

4 Therefore, since {β1,,βk} is a prereduction-of-type [n1,,nk] of I, it follows from Remark 5.5.2.d that degree({β1,,βk}¯)max({n1,,nk}), and the strict inequality may hold; this is related to Remark 5.10.3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.