28
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Profinite version of the Beckmann-Black problem

Pages 3054-3064 | Received 04 Mar 2021, Accepted 22 Jan 2024, Published online: 14 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

The Beckmann-Black problem asks whether any given finite Galois extension E/K of group G is the specialization at some point t0P1(K) of some finite regular Galois extension F/K(T) with the same group. In this paper, we study a generalization of this problem for infinite extensions, via the profinite twisting lemma, and apply the latter in many situations, like abelian infinite extensions and the l-universal Frattini cover of an arbitrary finite group.

2020 MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank P. Dèbes for very helpful comments and many valuable suggestions. Also, I am indebted to an anonymous reviewer for insightful comments and a kind help and his interest in my paper.

Notes

1 Unramified point t0P1(K) in the extension F/K(T) here means that the ideal Tt0 is unramified in F/K(T).

2 A field K is said to be an ample field if each geometrically irreducible smooth curve defined over K with at least one K-rational point has infinitely many such points (for more detail, see [3, 8, 14, 18]).

3 This means that t is globally invariant under the action of GK and that each coordinate is separable.

4 A field K is said to be a real closed field if K is an ordered field for which no non-trivial algebraic extension can be ordered. The field of real numbers R is a real closed field.

5 The viewpoints of cover and field extensions are equivalent, thus allowing to define a regular realization in terms of cover.

6 The branch point set of a cover f:XP1 is the finite set of points tP1 such that the associated discrete valuations are ramified in the corresponding function field extension K¯(X)/K¯(T).

7 We can drop the hypothesis “K is an uncountable field” in proportion 3.1 of [13] because we assume that the tower of G-extensions has an unramified point t0K.

8 In similar proof as in Corollary 4.2, we have the same result for K is real closed field. e.g. K=R, because it is a regular ψ-free field (see [9, theorem 2.3]) and for K=Qab((x)) is a field of formal Laurent series with coefficients in Qab, because it is a regular ψ-free field (see [9, Section 3.2]).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.