“Technology inevitably involves trade-offs”: The framing of technology in social studies standards

ABSTRACT

We live in an era of rapid technological change. Not only must citizens contend with social problems presented by new and more invasive technologies, but they must also make sense of older technologies that can be viewed as natural to the world. We sought to answer the question, how is technology included and framed in K–12 content social studies standards? Through coding, we identified 984 references where students are expected to learn about technology in the K–12 social studies standards of 10 states. Overall, the standards showed a preference for broad labels and neutral or positive framing, with technology often serving as a vehicle to explain social phenomena or economic growth. Production technologies were most frequent, but there was wide variance in the particular technologies referenced by each state. Even when technology was referenced, it often was not the primary focus of the standard’s content. Standards rarely framed technology with critical perspectives for inquiry into collateral, unintended, and disproportionate effects. We draw on technology criticism to offer a technoskeptical framework that educators and scholars can use to question narratives of technological progress and encourage collateral thinking about the consequences of technologies for human societies.

KEYWORDS:

• Academic standards
• citizenship education
• civics of technology
• history education
• social studies education
• technology
• technoskepticism

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Seda Turk and Jessica Gallow of the University of North Texas for their assistance with tables and data.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).