![Sample our Law journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5942/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Law.jpg"})
Abstract
On June 21, 1976, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Ohio Supreme Court and held that subjecting changes in zoning to a mandatory referendum of voters in the city did not deny due process of law to the individual property owner. The decision raised more questions than it answered. Some of those questions are discussed in the following series of comments by four experts in the fields of zoning and planning. An abstract of the Eastlake case appears in 28 ZD 328.