![Sample our Built Environment journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5926/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Built-Environment.jpg"})
Abstract
Whether those actions of government that implement general (master, comprehensive) plans must be consistent with those plans is one of the most ancient planning law issues. This article revisits the issue in the context of the California experience. That experience is instructive because one of the leading early cases requiring consistency came from California.1 Moreover, the California statute requiring consistency has been in existence longer than most of the other state statutes with stringent consistency requirements.2