3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

The Metamorphosis of Justices Mosk and Tobriner and the California Supreme Court

Pages 10-11 | Published online: 21 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

The California Supreme Court has been reinforcing its reputation as preservationist in land development and environmental control controversies for over a decade.1 Many of these cases led to the court's national reputation as one that made significant decisions.2 The reputation is probably undeserved. The decisions were mostly noteworthy because they were so biased against development interests. As distinguished from most state supreme courts, the California high court always found against the developer.3 To knowledgeable observers, then, the court's decisions had a ho-hum predictability about them.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.