4
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Did Martin Go Further Than Necessary?

Pages 9-11 | Published online: 14 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

As with many high court decisions, what is left unsaid is often as important as what is stated. In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop, 747 N.E.2d 131 (Mass. 2001), 53 ZD XX., the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's holding is clear: The Massachusetts Zoning Act and accompanying case law bar unreasonable application of zoning regulations for the use of land or structures for religious purposes.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.