5
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Sweet Affirmation

Pages 17-19 | Published online: 12 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

On April 23, 2002, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency avoided a $27 million trainwreck. The agency, needless to say, breathed a sigh of relief since, in the short run, governments do not win takings cases, they avoid losing them. The Supreme Court's opinion, however, contains some interesting grist for the mills of land-use professionals beyond discussion of the Court's central holding in the case (that Penn Central, not Lucas, applies to regulations that eliminate something less than the total ownership interest). With embarrassing superficiality, I set forth a few observations.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.