4
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

The Hidden Agenda (?): Buckeye and Due Process Review of Land Use Decisions

Pages 9-11 | Published online: 12 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

For those sensible states that do not allow land use referenda (approximately half of the total), City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation may seem to be someone else's problem. After all, in our calmer, saner jurisdictions (mainly in the East), we have, as a matter of state law, decided that land use referenda are an affront to good planning. In fact, the Buckeye facts themselves demonstrate the wisdom ultimately attained by the Ohio Supreme Court when it voided the referendum: it gets ugly when the electorate votes up or down on particular land use measures.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.