A comparison of regularization methods applied to the linear discriminant function with high-dimensional microarray data

Abstract

Classification of gene expression microarray data is important in the diagnosis of diseases such as cancer, but often the analysis of microarray data presents difficult challenges because the gene expression dimension is typically much larger than the sample size. Consequently, classification methods for microarray data often rely on regularization techniques to stabilize the classifier for improved classification performance. In particular, numerous regularization techniques, such as covariance-matrix regularization, are available, which, in practice, lead to a difficult choice of regularization methods. In this paper, we compare the classification performance of five covariance-matrix regularization methods applied to the linear discriminant function using two simulated high-dimensional data sets and five well-known, high-dimensional microarray data sets. In our simulation study, we found the minimum distance empirical Bayes method reported in Srivastava and Kubokawa [Comparison of discrimination methods for high dimensional data, J. Japan Statist. Soc. 37(1) (2007), pp. 123–134], and the new linear discriminant analysis reported in Thomaz, Kitani, and Gillies [A Maximum Uncertainty LDA-based approach for Limited Sample Size problems – with application to Face Recognition, J. Braz. Comput. Soc. 12(1) (2006), pp. 1–12], to perform consistently well and often outperform three other prominent regularization methods. Finally, we conclude with some recommendations for practitioners.

Keywords:

• linear discriminant analysis
• covariance-matrix regularization
• high-dimensional supervised classification
• microarray data
• expected error rate

AMS Subject Classification :

• 62H30
• 62P10
• 65C05

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Dean Young for his helpful suggestions and discussions and Mrs Joy Young for her numerous recommendations that enhanced the quality of our writing. We also thank the associate editor for comments and suggestions which have improved the presentation of our work substantially.