Abstract
Extensive potentiometric and spectrophotometric (visible region) data resulted in the unravelling of the complete details of complex formation of N,N′-bis(2-aminoethyl) oxamide (L1) and N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl) oxamide (L2). This study reveals both similarities and differences in complex formation for these ligands. Earlier reports gave evidence for the formation of a Cu3L2H-4 complex of L2. We show that L1 forms a Cu2L2H2 complex. This difference in behaviour is due to a decrease in stability of the CuLH-2 complex of L2 compared to that of L1. The complexation of Ni2+ by L1 is also discussed.