The effects of gain versus loss framing and issue involvement on publics’ responses to nuclear energy messages in South Korea

ABSTRACT

This study investigates how the public’s perceptions of nuclear power, one of the modern technologies at the center of public debate on risk issues, are influenced by gain versus loss framing in the volatile context of nuclear energy applications in South Korea. Drawing upon prospect theory as its conceptual framework, this experiment using 566 adult participants found that loss-framed messages (i.e. emphasizing the negative outcomes of not using nuclear power) were more effective in increasing participants’ message credibility perceptions as compared to gain-framed messages (i.e. emphasizing the positive outcomes of using nuclear power). Additionally, the results found issue involvement to be a significant moderator of the framing effect, by demonstrating that the advantage of loss framing was stronger for participants who were highly involved in nuclear energy issue, as compared to those who were less involved in the issue. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes on contributor

Hyo Jung Kim (Ph.D., University of Missouri - Columbia, 2010) is an Associate Professor at Kepco International Nuclear Graduate School (KINGS), South Korea. She is interested in examining the cognitive and affective mechanisms in health, science, and risk communication.