![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Notes
1 Martin, Susan B. Citation2016. Norms, Military Utility, and the Use/Non-Use of Weapons: the Case of Anti-Plant and Irritant Agents in the Vietnam War. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3).
2 See Evron, Yoram. Citation2012. China’s Military Procurement Approach in the Early 21st Century and its Operational Implications. Journal of Strategic Studies 35(1), 63-93; Erickson, Andrew S. Citation2014. Rising Tide, Dispersing Wave: Opportunities and Challenges for Chinese Seapower Development. Journal of Strategic Studies 37(3), 372–402; Chase, Michael S. and Cristina L. Garafola. Citation2016. China’s Search for a ‘Strategic Air Force’. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(1), 4–28.
3 Jackson, Van. Citation2016. Red Teaming the Rebalance: The Theory and Risks of US Asia Strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3).
4 Sangkuk Lee. 2104. China’s ‘Three Warfares’: Origins, Applications, and Organizations. Journal of Strategic Studies 37(2), 198–221; Manicom, James. Citation2014. China and American Seapower in East Asia: Is Accommodation Possible? Journal of Strategic Studies 37(3), 345–371; Li, Miangjiang. Citation2015. The People’s Liberation Army and China’s Smart Power Quandary in Southeast Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies 38(3), 369–382.
5 Wu Zhengyu, “The Crowe Memorandum, the Rebalance to Asia, and Sino-US Relations”, Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3) (May 2016).
6 Luis Simon. “The ‘Third’ US Offset Strategy and Europe’s ‘Anti-Access’ Challenge”, Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3) (May 2016).
7 Another perspective is Inboden, William. Citation2014. Statecraft, Decision-Making, and the Varieties of Historical Experience: A Taxonomy. Journal of Strategic Studies 37(2), 291–318.
8 Miller, Paul D. Citation2016. Graveyard of Analogies: The Use and Abuse of History for the War in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3).
9 Greentree, Todd. 2014. Bureaucracy Does Its Thing: US Performance and the Institutional Dimension of Strategy in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies 36(3), 325–256; Cronin, Audrey Kurth. Citation2014. The War on Terrorism: What Does it Mean to Win? Journal of Strategic Studies 37(2), 174–197.
10 Harrison, Mark. 2016. World War II: Won By American Planes and Ships, or the Poor Bloody Russian Infantry. Journal of Strategic Studies 39(3).
11 O’Brien, Philips Payson. Citation2015. How the War Was Won: Air-Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.