![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Notes
1 For more on geopolitics, see Geoffrey Sloan and Colin S. Gray, (eds.), Special Issue on Geopolitics, Geography, and Strategy, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 22/2–3 (1999); Jon Sumida, ‘Alfred Thayer Mahan, Geopolitician’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 22/2 (1999), 39–62; and Thomas P. Cavanna, ‘Geopolitics over Proliferation: the Origins of US Grand Strategy and Their Implications for the Spread of Nuclear Weapons in South Asia’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 41/4 (2018), 576–603.
2 For recent treatments of grand strategy, see Jacqueline L. Hazelton, ‘Drone Strikes and Grand Strategy: Toward a Political Understanding of the Uses of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks in US Security Policy’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 40/1–2 (2017), 68–91; and Ionut C. Popescu, ‘Grand Strategy vs. Emergent Strategy in the conduct of foreign policy’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 41/3 (2018), 438–60.
3 Analyses of Chinese military growth include Tai Ming Cheung, ‘Innovation in China’s Defense Technology Base: Foreign Technology and Military Capabilities’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 39/5–6 (2016), 728–61; Richard A. Bitzinger, ‘Reforming China’s Defense Industry’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 39/5–6 (2016), 762–89; Yves-Heng Lim, ‘Expanding the Dragon’s Reach: The Rise of China’s Anti-access Naval Doctrine and Forces’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 40/1–2 (2017), 146–68; and Joel Wuthnow, ‘A Brave New World for Chinese Joint Operations’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 40/1–2 (2017), 169–95.
4 Discussing different styles of Russian activism are Reuben Steff and Nicholas Khoo, ‘Hard Balancing in the Age of American Unipolarity: The Russian Response to US Ballistic Missile Defense during the Bush Administration (2001–2008)’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 37/2 (2014), 222–58; Martin Kragh and Sebastian Åsberg, ‘Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 40/6 (2017), 773–816; Luigi Scazzieri, ‘Europe, Russia and the Ukraine crisis: the dynamics of coercion’, The Journal of Strategic Studies 40/3 (2017), 392–416; and Dmitry Adamsky, ‘From Moscow with coercion: Russian deterrence theory and strategic culture’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 41/1–2 (2018), 33–60.